Advertisement
GFL vs QLVD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Hold and QLVD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- GFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.40% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
GFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+2.47% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
GFL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GFL | QLVD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 69% |
Advertisement
GFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.
QLVD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVD has been loosely correlated with SW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVD jumps, then SW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVD | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| SW - QLVD | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| GFL - QLVD | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| SHEL - QLVD | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| FERG - QLVD | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| AI - QLVD | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.58% | ||
More | ||||