GFL
Price
$49.56
Change
-$0.64 (-1.27%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.01B
73 days until earnings call
MEG
Price
$28.00
Change
-$0.08 (-0.28%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
988.02M
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs MEG

Header iconGFL vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts GFL vs MEGBanner chart's image
GFL Environmental
Price$49.56
Change-$0.64 (-1.27%)
Volume$988.47K
Capitalization18.01B
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$28.00
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
Volume$650.64K
Capitalization988.02M
GFL vs MEG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. MEG commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Hold and MEG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GFL: $49.56 vs. MEG: $28.00)
Brand notoriety: GFL and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 88% vs. MEG: 146%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $18.01B vs. MEG: $988.02M
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $18.01B. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $988.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $91.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than MEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEG is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was +7.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

MEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.25% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($18B) has a higher market cap than MEG($988M). MEG YTD gains are higher at: 50.943 vs. GFL (11.378). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.9B vs. MEG (25.7M). GFL has more cash in the bank: 140M vs. MEG (30.3M). MEG has less debt than GFL: MEG (301M) vs GFL (7.21B). GFL has higher revenues than MEG: GFL (8.08B) vs MEG (719M).
GFLMEGGFL / MEG
Capitalization18B988M1,822%
EBITDA1.9B25.7M7,389%
Gain YTD11.37850.94322%
P/E Ratio1704.10N/A-
Revenue8.08B719M1,124%
Total Cash140M30.3M462%
Total Debt7.21B301M2,395%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAGL30.630.23
+0.77%
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
CPNQ25.86N/A
-0.02%
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Dec
DVAL14.33-0.01
-0.10%
BrandywineGLOBAL Dyn US Lrg Cap Val ETF
HF20.76-0.02
-0.12%
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF
SDHY16.72-0.12
-0.71%
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-1.27%
WCN - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
CWST - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
WM - GFL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
RSG - GFL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
CLH - GFL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
More

MEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEG and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEG and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEG
1D Price
Change %
MEG100%
-0.28%
NVRI - MEG
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
CWST - MEG
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
GFL - MEG
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
ESGL - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
QRHC - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
More