GFGSF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
28.8M
GFIOF
Price
$25.38
Change
-$0.42 (-1.63%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
28.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFGSF vs GFIOF

Header iconGFGSF vs GFIOF Comparison
Open Charts GFGSF vs GFIOFBanner chart's image
GFG Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$394.6K
Capitalization28.8M
Gold Fields
Price$25.38
Change-$0.42 (-1.63%)
Volume$501
Capitalization28.19B
GFGSF vs GFIOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFGSF vs. GFIOF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFGSF is a Hold and GFIOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GFGSF: $0.10 vs. GFIOF: $25.38)
Brand notoriety: GFGSF and GFIOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFGSF: 381% vs. GFIOF: 172%
Market capitalization -- GFGSF: $28.8M vs. GFIOF: $28.19B
GFGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $28.8M. GFIOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $28.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFIOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GFGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFIOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the long-term than GFGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFGSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFIOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFGSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GFIOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the short-term than GFGSF.

Price Growth

GFGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.47% price change this week, while GFIOF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFIOF($28.2B) has a higher market cap than GFGSF($28.8M). GFIOF YTD gains are higher at: 88.793 vs. GFGSF (-20.079).
GFGSFGFIOFGFGSF / GFIOF
Capitalization28.8M28.2B0%
EBITDA2.13MN/A-
Gain YTD-20.07988.793-23%
P/E RatioN/A18.39-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash4.02MN/A-
Total Debt24.2KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFGSF vs GFIOF: Fundamental Ratings
GFGSF
GFIOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
8542
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFIOF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (33). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFGSF (100). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew significantly faster than GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFGSF (85). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (64). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFGSF (100). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFGSFGFIOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAMS25.312.35
+10.24%
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV
ICHR17.440.78
+4.68%
Ichor Holdings
TARA3.130.03
+0.97%
Protara Therapeutics
EIX53.77-1.17
-2.13%
Edison International
FTEL0.48-0.04
-6.88%
Fitell Corp

GFGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFGSF and GBBFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFGSF and GBBFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFGSF
1D Price
Change %
GFGSF100%
+3.63%
GBBFF - GFGSF
10%
Poorly correlated
-19.20%
GGLDF - GFGSF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
GFKRF - GFGSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFIOF - GFGSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGXXF - GFGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GFIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFIOF and SSRM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFIOF and SSRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFIOF
1D Price
Change %
GFIOF100%
N/A
SSRM - GFIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
GGAZF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
SXNTF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
FTBYF - GFIOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
GFGSF - GFIOF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
More