Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFGF vs RECS
GFGF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GFGF vs RECS
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
Price$32.75
Change+$0.37 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.82M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$36.66
Change+$0.21 (+0.58%)
Volume$376.74K
Net Assets3.02B
GFGF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFGF vs. RECS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFGF is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.02B vs. GFGF (34.8M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than GFGF: RECS (5.893) vs GFGF (3.089). GFGF was incepted earlier than RECS: GFGF (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GFGF (0.65). RECS has a higher turnover GFGF (33.00) vs GFGF (33.00).
| GFGF | RECS | GFGF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.089 | 5.893 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 34.8M | 3.02B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 49.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.69 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GFGF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GFGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFGF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFGF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MSFT - GFGF | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| APO - GFGF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| AMZN - GFGF | 67% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| MPWR - GFGF | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| SPGI - GFGF | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||