Advertisement
GFGF vs MPWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFGF is a Buy and MPWR is a Buy.
MPWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GFGF | MPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LRNZ | 44.17 | 0.63 | +1.44% |
| TrueShares Tech, AI and Deep Lrng ETF | |||
| MILK | 25.15 | 0.29 | +1.16% |
| Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | |||
| SCZ | 75.75 | 0.60 | +0.80% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | |||
| HERO | 32.71 | 0.24 | +0.72% |
| Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | |||
| XONE | 49.57 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg One YrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
GFGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFGF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFGF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFGF | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| MSFT - GFGF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| APO - GFGF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| AMZN - GFGF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MPWR - GFGF | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| META - GFGF | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
MPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | 100% | +2.09% | ||
| KLAC - MPWR | 75% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| LRCX - MPWR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| NXPI - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| AMAT - MPWR | 71% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| ADI - MPWR | 71% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||