Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs ZVNBX
GFFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$43.09
Change+$0.20 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.95M
GFFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNBX (136M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFFFX (0.50) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFFFX (17 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFFFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. GFFFX (11.84). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. ZVNBX (13.99).
| GFFFX | ZVNBX | GFFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.30 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.52 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 13.904 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 136M | 247,059% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 23.68 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.18 | 124.90 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | 13.99 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.46 | 341.95 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers