Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WSACX
GFFFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.89
Change-$0.15 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.98M
GFFFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WSACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WSACX (63M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: GFFFX (0.52) vs WSACX (0.06). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: GFFFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. WSACX (12.15). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. WSACX (27.16).
| GFFFX | WSACX | GFFFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.34 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.34 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 7.634 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 63M | 522,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.06 | 834% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 12.15 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 14.93 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | 27.16 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | 25.63 | 347% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement