Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WSACX
GFFFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$30.11
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.32M
GFFFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WSACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WSACX (63.3M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: GFFFX (0.51) vs WSACX (0.06). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: GFFFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. WSACX (14.37). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. WSACX (24.81).
| GFFFX | WSACX | GFFFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.34 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.34 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 7.958 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 63.3M | 524,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.06 | 825% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 14.37 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 22.89 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 24.81 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 32.79 | 310% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement