Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WPSZX
GFFFX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$57.80
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.53M
GFFFX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPSZX (756M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WPSZX: GFFFX (0.53) vs WPSZX (0.15). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). WPSZX (0.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFFFX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. WPSZX (3.52). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.15 vs. WPSZX (31.49).
| GFFFX | WPSZX | GFFFX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.72 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.72 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.442 | 8.974 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 756M | 43,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.15 | 352% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.04 | 3.52 | 513% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.30 | 27.39 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.15 | 31.49 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | 99.13 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement