Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WPSGX
GFFFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$77.99
Change-$0.94 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$54.21
Change-$0.94 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets724.57M
GFFFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. WPSGX (725M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFFFX (0.56) vs WPSGX (0.14). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. WPSGX (-3.46). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.43 vs. WPSGX (29.29).
| GFFFX | WPSGX | GFFFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.150 | 2.554 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 725M | 42,207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.14 | 410% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | -3.46 | -217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.22 | 24.74 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.43 | 29.29 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.55 | 88.83 | 84% |