Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WPSGX
GFFFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$57.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.53M
GFFFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPSGX (756M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFFFX (0.53) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. WPSGX (1.85). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.76 vs. WPSGX (29.97).
| GFFFX | WPSGX | GFFFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.536 | 8.816 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 756M | 43,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.13 | 396% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.90 | 1.85 | 913% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.90 | 18.95 | 263% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.76 | 29.97 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.99 | 96.28 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement