Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WPSGX
GFFFX vs WPSGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WPSGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$82.54
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
Price$56.53
Change+$0.62 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
GFFFX vs WPSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WPSGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WPSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. WPSGX (751M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WPSGX: GFFFX (0.53) vs WPSGX (0.13). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WPSGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WPSGX (31 years). WPSGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSGX (11.00). WPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: WPSGX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. WPSGX (0.24). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. WPSGX (32.75).
| GFFFX | WPSGX | GFFFX / WPSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 6.943 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 751M | 43,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.13 | 396% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 0.24 | 4,624% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 27.71 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | 32.75 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.97 | 98.08 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement