Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WPCSX
GFFFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$82.54
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.90
Change+$0.53 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
GFFFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. WPCSX (751M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFFFX (0.53) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFFFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. WPCSX (-2.18). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. WPCSX (22.53).
| GFFFX | WPCSX | GFFFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.75 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.75 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 6.397 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 751M | 43,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | -2.18 | -510% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 21.76 | 278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | 22.53 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.97 | 72.55 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement