Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$77.99
Change-$0.94 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
William Blair Growth N
Price$8.62
Change-$0.14 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.84M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. WBGSX (225M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.56) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. WBGSX (-20.55). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.43 vs. WBGSX (-12.13).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.150 | -1.934 | -266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 225M | 136,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | -20.55 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.22 | 3.23 | 1,677% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.43 | -12.13 | -416% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.55 | -39.08 | -191% |