Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
William Blair Growth N
Price$6.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.76M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and WBGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WBGSX (232M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.49) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. WBGSX (-25.08). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. WBGSX (-38.92).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | -22.867 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 232M | 146,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | -25.08 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.45 | -14.50 | -458% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | -38.92 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.57 | -45.98 | -214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement