Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.75M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WBGSX (250M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.50) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.84 vs. WBGSX (-14.81). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. WBGSX (-15.61).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 12.514 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 250M | 134,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | -14.81 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.18 | 20.76 | 353% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | -15.61 | -264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.46 | -29.15 | -351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement