Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.28
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.59M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WBGSX (243M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.49) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. WBGSX (-19.38). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. WBGSX (-19.57).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.145 | 11.718 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 243M | 139,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | -19.38 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 11.09 | 564% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | -19.57 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.37 | -32.04 | -298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement