Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs VCBCX
GFFFX vs VCBCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs VCBCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.00
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
VALIC Company I Systematic Growth
Price$21.26
Change-$0.46 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
GFFFX vs VCBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. VCBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and VCBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. VCBCX (1.08B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than VCBCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs VCBCX (0.07). GFFFX was incepted earlier than VCBCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs VCBCX (25 years). VCBCX (0.82) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). VCBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). VCBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: VCBCX (0) vs GFFFX (250). VCBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. GFFFX (6.94). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.24 vs. VCBCX (-14.14).
| GFFFX | VCBCX | GFFFX / VCBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.64 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.82 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.298 | 8.643 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.08B | 31,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.07 | 664% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 9.24 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.10 | 45.22 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.24 | -14.14 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.02 | 20.05 | 484% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement