Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs URLGX
GFFFX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$82.54
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$3.61
Change+$0.05 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.91M
GFFFX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. URLGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and URLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. URLGX (724M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than URLGX: GFFFX (0.53) vs URLGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than URLGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.44) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: URLGX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. URLGX (-33.52). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. URLGX (-67.54).
| GFFFX | URLGX | GFFFX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.30 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | -26.025 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 724M | 44,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | -33.52 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | -23.35 | -259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | -67.54 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.97 | -79.08 | -111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement