Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs UMLGX
GFFFX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.88M
GFFFX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. UMLGX (714M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: GFFFX (0.53) vs UMLGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: GFFFX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. UMLGX (-6.38). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.15 vs. UMLGX (-42.83).
| GFFFX | UMLGX | GFFFX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.80 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.94 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.442 | -9.164 | -147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 714M | 45,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.04 | -6.38 | -283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.30 | 10.45 | 568% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.15 | -42.83 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | -57.91 | -152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement