Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs TCPWX
GFFFX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$14.51
Change+$0.29 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
GFFFX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. TCPWX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and TCPWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. TCPWX (1.67B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: GFFFX (0.51) vs TCPWX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: GFFFX (17 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). TCPWX (0.74) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: TCPWX (0) vs GFFFX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 74.12 vs. GFFFX (18.73). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. TCPWX (-28.36).
| GFFFX | TCPWX | GFFFX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.74 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.74 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 27.208 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.67B | 19,845% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 74.12 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 129.30 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | -28.36 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | N/A | - |