Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs SLCGX
GFFFX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$78.86
Change+$0.87 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$30.38
Change+$0.40 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.97M
GFFFX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. SLCGX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and SLCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. SLCGX (37M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: GFFFX (0.56) vs SLCGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. SLCGX (-1.96). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.43 vs. SLCGX (25.65).
| GFFFX | SLCGX | GFFFX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.70 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.70 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.150 | 3.917 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 37M | 827,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | -1.96 | -382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.22 | 42.69 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.43 | 25.65 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.55 | 7.86 | 949% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement