Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RGWCX
GFFFX vs RGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
GFFFX vs RGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RGWCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RGWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RGWCX (384M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RGWCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RGWCX (19 years). RGWCX (3.52) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RGWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs RGWCX (2500). RGWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. GFFFX (6.03). RGWCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.86 vs. GFFFX (23.69).
| GFFFX | RGWCX | GFFFX / RGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.93 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 3.52 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | 10.635 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 384M | 88,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 6.51 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 93.31 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | 30.86 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | 53.53 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement