Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RGWCX
GFFFX vs RGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.28
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
GFFFX vs RGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RGWCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and RGWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RGWCX (383M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RGWCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RGWCX (18 years). RGWCX (3.52) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RGWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs RGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. RGWCX (5.72). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. RGWCX (28.53).
| GFFFX | RGWCX | GFFFX / RGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.93 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 3.52 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.145 | 17.350 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 383M | 88,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 5.72 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 81.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | 28.53 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.37 | 49.91 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement