Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLCX
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.18M
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RDLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RDLCX (318M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLCX (19 years). RDLCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. RDLCX (5.36). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. RDLCX (4.37).
| GFFFX | RDLCX | GFFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.90 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | 8.903 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 318M | 106,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 5.36 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 64.43 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | 4.37 | 542% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | 22.47 | 430% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement