Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLCX
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.94M
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RDLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. RDLCX (309M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.84 vs. RDLCX (5.61). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. RDLCX (1.93).
| GFFFX | RDLCX | GFFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.92 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 14.549 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 309M | 109,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 5.61 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.18 | 49.65 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | 1.93 | 2,136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.46 | 19.07 | 537% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement