Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLCX
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.14
Change+$0.09 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.46M
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RDLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RDLCX (299M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. RDLCX (9.40). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. RDLCX (1.10).
| GFFFX | RDLCX | GFFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.92 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 9.989 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 299M | 111,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 9.40 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 35.79 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 1.10 | 3,962% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 17.11 | 594% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement