Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLCX
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$79.31
Change-$9.63 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.60
Change-$1.14 (-10.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.04M
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RDLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RDLCX (301M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFFFX (0.46) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFFFX (18 years) vs RDLCX (19 years). RDLCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RDLCX (3.00) and GFFFX (2.94) have marching annual gain over last year. GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.53 vs. RDLCX (-5.33).
| GFFFX | RDLCX | GFFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.90 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.999 | -2.736 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 301M | 111,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 3.00 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.91 | 40.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.53 | -5.33 | -273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.87 | 34.27 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers