Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLAX
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$11.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.37M
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RDLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RDLAX (301M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GFFFX (0.51) vs RDLAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. RDLAX (14.85). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.03 vs. RDLAX (12.90).
| GFFFX | RDLAX | GFFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.06 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.17 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 11.224 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 301M | 110,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 14.85 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 37.82 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 12.90 | 357% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.80 | 35.33 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement