Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLAX
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.18M
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RDLAX (318M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RDLAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). RDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. GFFFX (6.03). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. RDLAX (15.38).
| GFFFX | RDLAX | GFFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.06 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.15 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | 11.317 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 318M | 106,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 7.72 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 73.16 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | 15.38 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | 43.85 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers