Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLAX
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.00
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.60
Change-$0.28 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.01M
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RDLAX (313M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RDLAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. RDLAX (7.60). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. RDLAX (16.14).
| GFFFX | RDLAX | GFFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.06 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.17 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.927 | 19.481 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 313M | 108,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 7.60 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.86 | 55.74 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.33 | 16.14 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.12 | 41.72 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement