Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RBCGX
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$79.31
Change-$9.63 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$65.42
Change-$15.57 (-19.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.24M
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RBCGX (71.2M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFFFX (0.46) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFFFX (18 years) vs RBCGX (38 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFFFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.94 vs. RBCGX (-6.22). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.53 vs. RBCGX (-13.78).
| GFFFX | RBCGX | GFFFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.999 | -1.357 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 71.2M | 471,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | -6.22 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.91 | 41.14 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.53 | -13.78 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.87 | 29.85 | 408% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement