Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RBCGX
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$75.90
Change+$0.33 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.26M
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RBCGX (76.3M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFFFX (0.53) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFFFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.34 vs. GFFFX (16.90). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.76 vs. RBCGX (20.23).
| GFFFX | RBCGX | GFFFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.536 | 12.561 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 76.3M | 429,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.90 | 21.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.90 | 50.92 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.76 | 20.23 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.99 | 20.73 | 420% |