Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RBCGX
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$67.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.32M
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RBCGX (73.3M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFFFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. RBCGX (-3.76). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. RBCGX (-3.90).
| GFFFX | RBCGX | GFFFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | -0.252 | -3,663% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 73.3M | 462,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -3.76 | -160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 59.84 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | -3.90 | -607% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | 18.54 | 521% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement