Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs QILGX
GFFFX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$42.67
Change+$0.16 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.99B
GFFFX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. QILGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and QILGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. QILGX (3.99B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than QILGX: GFFFX (0.50) vs QILGX (0.01). GFFFX was incepted earlier than QILGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: GFFFX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.27 vs. GFFFX (11.84). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.45 vs. GFFFX (41.27).
| GFFFX | QILGX | GFFFX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 15.731 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 3.99B | 8,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.01 | 8,129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 17.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.18 | 88.43 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | 51.45 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.46 | 148.71 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement