Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOYX
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.04
Change-$1.02 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$143.46
Change-$0.70 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.41B
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. PNOYX (6.41B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFFFX: PNOYX (0.61) vs GFFFX (0.52). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). PNOYX (0.62) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.66 vs. PNOYX (-1.94). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. PNOYX (23.77).
| GFFFX | PNOYX | GFFFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.307 | 3.365 | 395% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 6.41B | 5,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.66 | -1.94 | -654% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 24.42 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | 23.77 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.43 | 89.09 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement