Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOYX
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$145.70
Change+$0.60 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.48B
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PNOYX (6.48B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFFFX: PNOYX (0.60) vs GFFFX (0.51). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). PNOYX (0.62) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. PNOYX (2.82). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.03 vs. PNOYX (24.94).
| GFFFX | PNOYX | GFFFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 4.979 | 333% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 6.48B | 5,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.60 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 2.82 | 777% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 30.62 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 24.94 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.80 | 89.87 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers