Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOYX
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.58
Change-$0.32 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$148.50
Change-$0.11 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PNOYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PNOYX (6.55B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFFFX: PNOYX (0.59) vs GFFFX (0.50). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). PNOYX (0.62) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. PNOYX (-2.94). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. PNOYX (22.41).
| GFFFX | PNOYX | GFFFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.080 | 6.996 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.55B | 5,164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.59 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.92 | -2.94 | -372% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.29 | 49.90 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | 22.41 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.57 | 91.46 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers