Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOPX
GFFFX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.26
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$129.63
Change+$0.48 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.49B
GFFFX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOPX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PNOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PNOPX (6.49B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: GFFFX (0.51) vs PNOPX (0.46). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOPX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. PNOPX (-3.43). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.27 vs. PNOPX (22.75).
| GFFFX | PNOPX | GFFFX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.649 | 5.881 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 6.49B | 5,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.46 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | -3.43 | -382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.91 | 42.42 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.27 | 22.75 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.27 | 89.70 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement