Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOPX
GFFFX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$126.85
Change-$0.57 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
GFFFX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PNOPX (6.44B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: GFFFX (0.52) vs PNOPX (0.46). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOPX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. PNOPX (-1.78). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. PNOPX (19.70).
| GFFFX | PNOPX | GFFFX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 3.610 | 400% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 6.44B | 5,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.46 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | -1.78 | -839% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 18.90 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | 19.70 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | 62.91 | 141% |