Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOPX
GFFFX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$127.78
Change-$0.23 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.47B
GFFFX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PNOPX (6.47B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: GFFFX (0.51) vs PNOPX (0.46). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOPX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. PNOPX (-0.10). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.16 vs. PNOPX (17.95).
| GFFFX | PNOPX | GFFFX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.667 | 4.370 | 359% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 6.47B | 5,135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.46 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | -0.10 | -18,680% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.59 | 32.14 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.16 | 17.95 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.14 | 73.73 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers