Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOCX
GFFFX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$80.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
GFFFX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PNOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOCX (6.7B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs PNOCX (0.02). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). PNOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOCX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. PNOCX (-7.46). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. PNOCX (-7.63).
| GFFFX | PNOCX | GFFFX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.62 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.62 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | -4.942 | -187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 6.7B | 5,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.02 | 2,243% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -7.46 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 25.06 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | -7.63 | -310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | 35.40 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement