Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.06
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.93B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$36.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PGWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. PGWCX (1.71B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.52) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGWCX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.26 vs. PGWCX (9.34). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.41 vs. PGWCX (-6.74).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.682 | 13.121 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 1.71B | 19,251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.26 | 9.34 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.78 | 42.96 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.41 | -6.74 | -658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.85 | 21.12 | 482% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement