Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PGWCX
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
Price$34.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
GFFFX vs PGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PGWCX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PGWCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PGWCX (1.85B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PGWCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs PGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PGWCX (42 years). PGWCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. PGWCX (20.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs PGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. PGWCX (2.69). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. PGWCX (-10.84).
| GFFFX | PGWCX | GFFFX / PGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.72 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | 6.113 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.85B | 18,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 2.69 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 85.98 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | -10.84 | -218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | 14.64 | 660% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement