Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs OWACX
GFFFX vs OWACX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs OWACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Old Westbury All Cap Core
Price$26.91
Change-$0.08 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43B
GFFFX vs OWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. OWACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and OWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. OWACX (3.43B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than OWACX: GFFFX (0.52) vs OWACX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than OWACX: GFFFX (17 years) vs OWACX (27 years). OWACX (0.96) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). OWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWACX: GFFFX (250) vs OWACX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. OWACX (0.56). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. OWACX (32.22).
| GFFFX | OWACX | GFFFX / OWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.96 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.96 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 6.448 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 3.43B | 9,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 0.56 | 2,668% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 18.42 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | 32.22 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | 91.35 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement