Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZLX
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.28
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$21.05
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.4M
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and NWZLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWZLX (223M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: GFFFX (0.49) vs NWZLX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWZLX (9 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. NWZLX (1.71). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. NWZLX (26.10).
| GFFFX | NWZLX | GFFFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.27 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.145 | 12.507 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 223M | 152,018% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 1.71 | 426% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 56.45 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | 26.10 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement