Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZLX
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$21.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.19M
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZLX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NWZLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. NWZLX (228M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: GFFFX (0.50) vs NWZLX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.32 vs. GFFFX (11.84). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. NWZLX (34.74).
| GFFFX | NWZLX | GFFFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.27 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 16.658 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 228M | 147,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 14.32 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.18 | 81.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | 34.74 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement