Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZLX
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.00
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.86
Change-$0.48 (-2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.4M
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWZLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWZLX (218M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: GFFFX (0.49) vs NWZLX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. NWZLX (4.40). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. NWZLX (32.55).
| GFFFX | NWZLX | GFFFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.27 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.927 | 15.040 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 218M | 155,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 4.40 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.86 | 64.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.33 | 32.55 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement