Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCFX
GFFFX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG R6
Price$68.60
Change+$0.29 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.36M
GFFFX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCFX (901M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: GFFFX (0.53) vs NWCFX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCFX (12 years). NWCFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. NWCFX (6.74). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.76 vs. NWCFX (39.43).
| GFFFX | NWCFX | GFFFX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.51 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.69 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.536 | 9.550 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 901M | 36,404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.90 | 6.74 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.90 | 42.98 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.76 | 39.43 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.99 | 43.05 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement