Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCCX
GFFFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$33.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.37M
GFFFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCCX (859M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. NWCCX (-20.87). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.69 vs. NWCCX (-21.30).
| GFFFX | NWCCX | GFFFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.65 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.78 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | -18.231 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 859M | 39,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | -20.87 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.67 | 8.95 | 756% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | -21.30 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.62 | -13.08 | -739% |