Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCAX
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.85
Change+$0.56 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.36M
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCAX (901M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: GFFFX (0.53) vs NWCAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. NWCAX (5.51). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.15 vs. NWCAX (33.62).
| GFFFX | NWCAX | GFFFX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.08 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.442 | 8.875 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 901M | 36,404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.04 | 5.51 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.30 | 47.52 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.15 | 33.62 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | 29.41 | 300% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement