Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCAX
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$82.54
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.28
Change+$0.74 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.6M
GFFFX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWCAX (897M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: GFFFX (0.53) vs NWCAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. NWCAX (-2.88). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. NWCAX (33.99).
| GFFFX | NWCAX | GFFFX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.08 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 7.855 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 897M | 36,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | -2.88 | -385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 50.17 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | 33.99 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.97 | 33.01 | 266% |