Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWADX
GFFFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.22M
GFFFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWADX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NWADX (218M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: GFFFX (0.52) vs NWADX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWADX (7 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: GFFFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.65 vs. GFFFX (14.95). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. NWADX (42.14).
| GFFFX | NWADX | GFFFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.92 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 13.205 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 218M | 150,917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 18.65 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 49.69 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | 42.14 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement