Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWADX
GFFFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.47M
GFFFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWADX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NWADX (222M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: GFFFX (0.51) vs NWADX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWADX (7 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: GFFFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.38 vs. GFFFX (18.73). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. NWADX (37.56).
| GFFFX | NWADX | GFFFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.92 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 13.152 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 222M | 149,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 20.38 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 69.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 37.56 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement