Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NLCCX
GFFFX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$34.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.19M
GFFFX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NLCCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NLCCX (835M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs NLCCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NLCCX (28 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFFFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. NLCCX (15.43). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. NLCCX (-15.55).
| GFFFX | NLCCX | GFFFX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.59 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.59 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 8.528 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 835M | 39,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 15.43 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 26.80 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | -15.55 | -280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 24.14 | 421% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement