Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NBGTX
GFFFX vs NBGTX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NBGTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.37
Change-$0.87 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Neuberger Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$29.58
Change-$0.34 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
GFFFX vs NBGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NBGTX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NBGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NBGTX (2.58B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: GFFFX (0.46) vs NBGTX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NBGTX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NBGTX (32 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBGTX (30.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: NBGTX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. NBGTX (2.36). NBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 25.72 vs. GFFFX (21.90).
| GFFFX | NBGTX | GFFFX / NBGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.573 | -0.303 | -519% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 2.58B | 13,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 2.36 | 420% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.10 | 47.19 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.90 | 25.72 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.83 | 86.34 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers