Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs MLACX
GFFFX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.09B
GFFFX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. MLACX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and MLACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. MLACX (14.1B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than MLACX: GFFFX (0.53) vs MLACX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFFFX (17 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFFFX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.04 vs. MLACX (-15.55). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.15 vs. MLACX (-40.47).
| GFFFX | MLACX | GFFFX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.88 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.89 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.442 | 11.422 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 14.1B | 2,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.04 | -15.55 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.30 | -10.99 | -540% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.15 | -40.47 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.28 | -51.52 | -171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement