Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs MBCNX
GFFFX vs MBCNX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs MBCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3
Price$17.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
GFFFX vs MBCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. MBCNX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and MBCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MBCNX (2.2B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than MBCNX: GFFFX (0.52) vs MBCNX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than MBCNX: GFFFX (17 years) vs MBCNX (23 years). MBCNX (1.35) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCNX (11.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCNX: GFFFX (250) vs MBCNX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. MBCNX (2.65). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. MBCNX (-27.51).
| GFFFX | MBCNX | GFFFX / MBCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.35 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.35 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 11.938 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 2.2B | 14,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 2.65 | 565% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | -5.78 | -750% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | -27.51 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | 0.73 | 12,180% |