Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs MBCNX
GFFFX vs MBCNX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs MBCNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3
Price$17.40
Change-$0.05 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
GFFFX vs MBCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. MBCNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and MBCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MBCNX (2.17B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than MBCNX: GFFFX (0.51) vs MBCNX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than MBCNX: GFFFX (17 years) vs MBCNX (23 years). MBCNX (1.35) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCNX (11.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBCNX: GFFFX (250) vs MBCNX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. MBCNX (4.76). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.16 vs. MBCNX (-30.51).
| GFFFX | MBCNX | GFFFX / MBCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.35 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.35 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.667 | 11.682 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 2.17B | 15,314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | 4.76 | 388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.59 | 6.62 | 916% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.16 | -30.51 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.14 | 8.21 | 1,232% |