Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LSGRX
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.28
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$33.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.15B
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LSGRX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and LSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LSGRX (18.1B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: GFFFX (0.49) vs LSGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LSGRX (35 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: GFFFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. LSGRX (6.52). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 40.56 vs. GFFFX (33.05).
| GFFFX | LSGRX | GFFFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.145 | 12.788 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 18.1B | 1,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 6.52 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.56 | 63.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | 40.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.37 | 184.06 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement