Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LSGRX
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.02
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$33.78
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.49B
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LSGRX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and LSGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LSGRX (18.5B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: GFFFX (0.49) vs LSGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LSGRX (35 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: GFFFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. GFFFX (5.87). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. GFFFX (23.69).
| GFFFX | LSGRX | GFFFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.236 | 14.276 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 18.5B | 1,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.87 | 9.93 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.45 | 107.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.69 | 48.22 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.57 | 195.79 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement