Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LSGRX
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.37
Change-$0.87 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$33.14
Change-$0.45 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.13B
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LSGRX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and LSGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LSGRX (18.1B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: GFFFX (0.46) vs LSGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LSGRX (35 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: GFFFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.43 vs. GFFFX (9.90). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 45.35 vs. GFFFX (21.90).
| GFFFX | LSGRX | GFFFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.573 | -0.241 | -653% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 18.1B | 1,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 14.43 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.10 | 89.26 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.90 | 45.35 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.83 | 219.54 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers