Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LGRNX
GFFFX vs LGRNX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LGRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$33.01
Change+$0.29 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.85B
GFFFX vs LGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LGRNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LGRNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGRNX (17.9B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LGRNX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LGRNX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LGRNX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LGRNX (13 years). LGRNX (0.57) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: GFFFX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.68 vs. GFFFX (18.73). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.34 vs. GFFFX (43.50).
| GFFFX | LGRNX | GFFFX / LGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.57 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.57 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 11.261 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 17.9B | 1,855% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 22.68 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 70.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 46.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 213.00 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers