Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LGLSX
GFFFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.26
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$56.18
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
GFFFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LGLSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and LGLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LGLSX (8.05B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LGLSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: LGLSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. GFFFX (13.07). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.27 vs. LGLSX (34.95).
| GFFFX | LGLSX | GFFFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.649 | 18.874 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 8.05B | 4,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 34.31 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.91 | 114.18 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.27 | 34.95 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.27 | 161.67 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement