Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LGLSX
GFFFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$54.75
Change+$0.75 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.9B
GFFFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LGLSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LGLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLSX (7.9B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LGLSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: LGLSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.85 vs. GFFFX (18.73). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. LGLSX (34.51).
| GFFFX | LGLSX | GFFFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 16.039 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 7.9B | 4,205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 42.85 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 97.84 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 34.51 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 142.55 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement