Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LGLFX
GFFFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$57.13
Change+$0.78 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.9B
GFFFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LGLFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LGLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLFX (7.9B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LGLFX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: LGLFX (0) vs GFFFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.22 vs. GFFFX (18.73). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. LGLFX (37.37).
| GFFFX | LGLFX | GFFFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 16.250 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 7.9B | 4,205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 43.22 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 99.34 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 37.37 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 151.67 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement