Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LGLAX
GFFFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$55.53
Change+$0.80 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8B
GFFFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LGLAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LGLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLAX (8B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LGLAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFFFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.87 vs. GFFFX (18.73). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. LGLAX (34.53).
| GFFFX | LGLAX | GFFFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.90 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 16.046 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 8B | 4,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 42.87 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 97.91 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 34.53 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 142.46 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement