Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LFGCX
GFFFX vs LFGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LFGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$40.00
Change+$0.59 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.52M
GFFFX vs LFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LFGCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LFGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LFGCX (158M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LFGCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LFGCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LFGCX (7 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: GFFFX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.98 vs. GFFFX (21.95). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.56 vs. GFFFX (46.03).
| GFFFX | LFGCX | GFFFX / LFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.80 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.20 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 15.674 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 158M | 210,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 51.98 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 92.12 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 54.56 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers