Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LEGCX
GFFFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Cornerstone Growth C
Price$55.13
Change+$0.36 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.39B
GFFFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LEGCX (6.39B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFFFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. LEGCX (13.11). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.03 vs. LEGCX (30.47).
| GFFFX | LEGCX | GFFFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.73 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.73 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 9.892 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 6.39B | 5,195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 13.11 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 66.27 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 30.47 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.80 | 77.31 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement