Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LEGCX
GFFFX vs LEGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LEGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$54.44
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
GFFFX vs LEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LEGCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LEGCX (6.34B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: GFFFX (0.52) vs LEGCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LEGCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LEGCX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: GFFFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. LEGCX (9.82). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. LEGCX (31.59).
| GFFFX | LEGCX | GFFFX / LEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.73 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.73 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 9.230 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 6.34B | 5,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 9.82 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 47.77 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | 31.59 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | 66.79 | 133% |