Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KLCSX
GFFFX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$21.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
GFFFX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KLCSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and KLCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KLCSX (1.27B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: GFFFX (0.51) vs KLCSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: KLCSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. KLCSX (-6.47). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. KLCSX (-36.97).
| GFFFX | KLCSX | GFFFX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.78 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.87 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 13.522 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.27B | 26,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | -6.47 | -289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | -17.26 | -353% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | -36.97 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 10.86 | 936% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement