Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KCGSX
GFFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$23.56
Change+$0.17 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.56M
GFFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and KCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KCGSX (267M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GFFFX (0.51) vs KCGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.23 vs. GFFFX (18.73). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.61 vs. GFFFX (43.50).
| GFFFX | KCGSX | GFFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.86 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 13.288 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 267M | 124,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 24.23 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.96 | 84.85 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 48.61 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.61 | 145.71 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement