Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KCGSX
GFFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.26
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.35
Change+$0.11 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.13M
GFFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and KCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. KCGSX (276M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GFFFX (0.51) vs KCGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GFFFX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.20 vs. GFFFX (13.07). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 57.97 vs. GFFFX (49.27).
| GFFFX | KCGSX | GFFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.86 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.649 | 17.236 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 276M | 122,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 21.20 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.91 | 105.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.27 | 57.97 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.27 | 169.88 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement