Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KCGIX
GFFFX vs KCGIX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KCGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$23.78
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.56M
GFFFX vs KCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KCGIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and KCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. KCGIX (267M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: GFFFX (0.51) vs KCGIX (0.06). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KCGIX: GFFFX (17 years) vs KCGIX (11 years). KCGIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: GFFFX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.38 vs. GFFFX (21.95). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.92 vs. GFFFX (46.03).
| GFFFX | KCGIX | GFFFX / KCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.76 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.76 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 13.853 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 267M | 124,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.06 | 921% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 27.38 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.88 | 78.24 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 51.92 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.80 | 148.04 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers