Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HSUCX
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.49
Change-$1.38 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.91
Change-$0.24 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.89M
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HSUCX (65.9M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFFFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. HSUCX (-2.59). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. HSUCX (-13.11).
| GFFFX | HSUCX | GFFFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.168 | 2.632 | 804% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 65.9M | 514,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | -2.59 | -274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.70 | 56.74 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | -13.11 | -265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.63 | -8.83 | -1,196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement