Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HSUCX
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.88
Change+$0.31 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.72M
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. HSUCX (67.7M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFFFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.84 vs. HSUCX (6.17). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. HSUCX (-9.40).
| GFFFX | HSUCX | GFFFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 1.796 | 1,011% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 67.7M | 497,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 6.17 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.18 | 62.13 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.27 | -9.40 | -439% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.46 | -82.05 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement