Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HSUCX
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$81.37
Change-$0.87 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.35
Change-$0.19 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.64M
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HSUCX (63.6M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFFFX (0.46) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFFFX (32.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFFFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. HSUCX (1.38). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.90 vs. HSUCX (-0.77).
| GFFFX | HSUCX | GFFFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.573 | 0.093 | 1,695% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 63.6M | 528,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 1.38 | 718% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.10 | 60.79 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.90 | -0.77 | -2,856% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.83 | -1.83 | -6,773% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers