Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HSUCX
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.00
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.24
Change-$0.46 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.24M
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and HSUCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HSUCX (65.2M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFFFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. HSUCX (0.56). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.24 vs. HSUCX (-10.24).
| GFFFX | HSUCX | GFFFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.298 | -0.186 | -9,313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 65.2M | 521,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 0.56 | 1,235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.10 | 46.55 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.24 | -10.24 | -373% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.02 | -15.02 | -646% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement