Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HGOCX
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$82.54
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$61.57
Change+$0.67 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
GFFFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and HGOCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HGOCX (5.97B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFFFX (0.53) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HGOCX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFFFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.68 vs. GFFFX (11.11). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. HGOCX (-34.39).
| GFFFX | HGOCX | GFFFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.86 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 4.250 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 5.97B | 5,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 13.68 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 105.78 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | -34.39 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.97 | -48.26 | -182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement