GFF
Price
$75.60
Change
+$0.77 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
46 days until earnings call
OC
Price
$143.12
Change
+$3.15 (+2.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.97B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFF vs OC

Header iconGFF vs OC Comparison
Open Charts GFF vs OCBanner chart's image
Griffon
Price$75.60
Change+$0.77 (+1.03%)
Volume$145.9K
Capitalization3.52B
Owens Corning
Price$143.12
Change+$3.15 (+2.25%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization11.97B
GFF vs OC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFF vs. OC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a Buy and OC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GFF: $75.60 vs. OC: $143.12)
Brand notoriety: GFF: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFF: 36% vs. OC: 125%
Market capitalization -- GFF: $3.52B vs. OC: $11.97B
GFF [@Building Products] is valued at $3.52B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $11.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $92.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GFF and OC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the short-term than GFF.

Price Growth

GFF (@Building Products) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

OC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-2.10% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OC($12B) has a higher market cap than GFF($3.52B). GFF has higher P/E ratio than OC: GFF (52.14) vs OC (17.52). GFF YTD gains are higher at: 6.869 vs. OC (-14.808). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.96B vs. GFF (275M). OC has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. GFF (107M). GFF has less debt than OC: GFF (1.63B) vs OC (5.98B). OC has higher revenues than GFF: OC (11.7B) vs GFF (2.52B).
GFFOCGFF / OC
Capitalization3.52B12B29%
EBITDA275M1.96B14%
Gain YTD6.869-14.808-46%
P/E Ratio52.1417.52298%
Revenue2.52B11.7B22%
Total Cash107M230M47%
Total Debt1.63B5.98B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFF vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
GFF
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1146
SMR RATING
1..100
2082
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
629
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (41) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (91) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (46) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's SMR Rating (20) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (82) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (62) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (29) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFFOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHLLF4.171.07
+34.54%
PETERSHILL PARTNERS PLC.
ICOP36.150.44
+1.23%
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
JHDV38.710.21
+0.54%
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
JPEM58.600.28
+0.48%
JPMorgan Diversified Return EMkts Eq ETF
PFFA21.960.08
+0.37%
Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF

GFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with TREX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then TREX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFF
1D Price
Change %
GFF100%
+1.03%
TREX - GFF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
MAS - GFF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
OC - GFF
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
FBIN - GFF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
ROCK - GFF
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
+2.25%
FBIN - OC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
TREX - OC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
MAS - OC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
BLDR - OC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
LPX - OC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
More