GFF
Price
$83.11
Change
+$8.03 (+10.70%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.87B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OC
Price
$124.96
Change
-$4.83 (-3.72%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.27B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFF vs OC

Header iconGFF vs OC Comparison
Open Charts GFF vs OCBanner chart's image
Griffon
Price$83.11
Change+$8.03 (+10.70%)
Volume$249.55K
Capitalization3.87B
Owens Corning
Price$124.96
Change-$4.83 (-3.72%)
Volume$3.03M
Capitalization10.27B
GFF vs OC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFF vs. OC commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a Hold and OC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (GFF: $83.11 vs. OC: $124.96)
Brand notoriety: GFF: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFF: 94% vs. OC: 228%
Market capitalization -- GFF: $3.87B vs. OC: $10.27B
GFF [@Building Products] is valued at $3.87B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $10.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $96.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFF is a better buy in the long-term than OC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFF is a better buy in the short-term than OC.

Price Growth

GFF (@Building Products) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

OC is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.33% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OC($10.3B) has a higher market cap than GFF($3.87B). GFF has higher P/E ratio than OC: GFF (76.25) vs OC (15.02). GFF (12.845) and OC (12.439) have similar YTD gains . OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. GFF (286M). GFF has less debt than OC: GFF (1.59B) vs OC (5.61B). OC has higher revenues than GFF: OC (11.7B) vs GFF (2.52B).
GFFOCGFF / OC
Capitalization3.87B10.3B38%
EBITDA286M1.15B25%
Gain YTD12.84512.439103%
P/E Ratio76.2515.02508%
Revenue2.52B11.7B22%
Total Cash99MN/A-
Total Debt1.59B5.61B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFF vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
GFF
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1168
SMR RATING
1..100
2794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (30) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (93) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (68) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's SMR Rating (27) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for OC (94) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew significantly faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (61) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (54) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFFOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTDDX39.110.57
+1.48%
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China A
SBASX13.340.05
+0.38%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
GSAKX22.780.04
+0.18%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc A
RNGFX75.78-1.22
-1.58%
American Funds New Economy R5
SCQGX85.00-1.71
-1.97%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth S

GFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFF
1D Price
Change %
GFF100%
+2.43%
BLDR - GFF
67%
Closely correlated
+4.67%
OC - GFF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
MAS - GFF
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
AWI - GFF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
TREX - GFF
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
+2.28%
FBIN - OC
79%
Closely correlated
+4.32%
TREX - OC
76%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
LII - OC
74%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
MAS - OC
74%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
BLDR - OC
71%
Closely correlated
+4.67%
More