Advertisement
GFAI vs HURN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAI is a Hold and HURN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFAI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHURN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GFAI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HURN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFAI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HURN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFAI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HURN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GFAI (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -24.29% price change this week, while HURN (@Data Processing Services) price change was -2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -4.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
HURN is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-4.04% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
@Data Processing Services (-2.31% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| GFAI | HURN | GFAI / HURN | |
| Capitalization | 10.1M | 2.86B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -23.29M | 214M | -11% |
| Gain YTD | -16.277 | -4.216 | 386% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.74 | - |
| Revenue | 36.3M | 1.66B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 20.2M | 23.9M | 85% |
| Total Debt | 6.64M | 651M | 1% |
HURN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GFAI | HURN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
GFAI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GFAI and KSCP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFAI and KSCP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFAI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFAI | 100% | -11.83% | ||
| KSCP - GFAI | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NSSC - GFAI | 29% Poorly correlated | +6.63% | ||
| AZZ - GFAI | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| GEO - GFAI | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| HURN - GFAI | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.92% | ||
More | ||||
HURN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HURN has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HURN jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HURN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HURN | 100% | -3.92% | ||
| GHC - HURN | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| LAUR - HURN | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| AZZ - HURN | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BCO - HURN | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| LOPE - HURN | 38% Loosely correlated | -6.06% | ||
More | ||||