Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNIX
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.81
Change-$9.47 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$40.13
Change-$5.63 (-12.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.82M
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and ZVNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ZVNIX (124M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNIX: GFAFX (0.22) vs ZVNIX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). ZVNIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNIX (15.24). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.63 vs. ZVNIX (-0.67). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.21 vs. ZVNIX (-16.34).
| GFAFX | ZVNIX | GFAFX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.16 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.017 | -5.108 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 124M | 270,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.63 | -0.67 | -393% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 82.41 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | -16.34 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.16 | 396.04 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement